I’ll be helping out with my bb’s game dev, so I’ll be learning some Godot.
Hopefully, I’ll get to document that learning here.
I’ll be helping out with my bb’s game dev, so I’ll be learning some Godot.
Hopefully, I’ll get to document that learning here.
Someone (SIS1) came to our house seeking help to check whether her sister’s (SIS2) getting scammed by her “foreigner boyfriend” (JOWA). I’ve had my suspicion when SIS2 told me before they only talk once a day, because he’s a seaman and that he’s sending her long emails about how he feels about her. I was worried the guy might be a human trafficker or might make her a drug mule, but I thought those were just intrusive thoughts so I held my tongue.
Now what prompted this was JOWA telling SIS2 that he’ll be resigning and putting up an appliance store here in the Philippines. It was followed by receipts of the appliances from Bed Bath & Beyond. SIS2 then received an email from “Aitec Cargo” informing her of an incoming package with a tracking number. My first suspicion was that they might be actually be some drug parcels, but it ended up being some good old freight scam.
My first thought was: why aitecargo.com
? Why not aiteccargo.com
? Was it carelessness or a poor attempt at branding?
I was surprised that the website (https://aitecargo.com) was accessible and that the package tracker works. On the other hand, it’s easy to whip up a website. Several elements of the website don’t work, particularly the footer. I was giving it the benefit of the doubt, so I thought it can just be a poorly made website for an obscure company.
Another thing I noted just know is that the reviews is for an altogether different company. Funny.
Searches for Aitec Cargo return nothing but this Facebook post with many commenters mentioning this company and asking whether it’s a scam. But more on that later.
I looked up their address and contact number (+1-201-645-7551, 1502 Red Maple Drive, City Of Commerce, CA 90040), but no results for the phone number and the address could not be found on Google Maps. Remember that this is supposedly a business entity.
As mentioned above, JOWA sent SIS2 receipts of the appliances from Bed Bath & Beyond. Items were hundreds of pressure cooker, mattresses, fans, etc, all amounting to about $27,000 USD if I remember correctly.
SIS1 and me noted that these receipts didn’t have the date of the transaction. I also looked up Bed Bath & Beyond receipts and those do not look like the receipts that SIS1 showed me. I couldn’t attach the receipts here, because I didn’t ask SIS1 to forward them to me.
We were able to “track” the package with the tracking number, but there were some inconsistencies like the freight amount and weight which further raised our suspicion.
Thanks to the tracking though, I got some (likely fake) information about our “sender”. Info like full name, address, phone number and email.
I looked up the email on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram — NADAH. Looked up his phone number, still nothing. His address, I looked up in Google Maps. The address was an industrial area. Factories only, no residence.
Also, he mentioned to SIS2 that he’s currently away at sea, and he’ll get off at some country and go straight to the Philippines. I wondered, why would the package be in his name? Wouldn’t he ask someone else to ship it?
And now, to the name. The name… is weird. There were two results. One is someone who was born on 1858. LOL. The other is a Facebook account. Gotcha.
I was actually surprised to see a Facebook account, especially because SIS2 was only in touch with him by Gmail. It made me check myself. It seemed… regular. Not enough information, but hey, maybe he was just private. The guy in the photo did look like the guy SIS2 showed me before. His About info were actually consistent with what she has told me.
I tried image searching his profile photo and the picture he sent SIS2 to see whether they were just lifted from the internet. Nothing.
Then, when I was about to share the page to SIS2, I saw this handle. It was some Tagalog slang.
His Facebook name was some weird non-Latin characters. So I googled that. I found a comment they made to some horny post. In fucking Tagalog. That sealed the deal for me. It was funny though, I thought “huli sa kalibugan” (caught a scammer by them being horny).
There was also one other Google search result from their name that I skipped earlier thinking it wasn’t relevant, but when I checked, it’s another comment by this account in Tagalog.
As mentioned above, looking up the shipping company led to a Facebook post with reports from at least four different women asking about the company within the past month. The post warns of freight scams, and these women were posting screenshots from Aitec Cargo. I didn’t know the authority of the poster to deem these as scam, but these are way too many reports about the same company in a short span of time.
The email from Aitec Cargo had the same format. Before I determined it was a scam, I wasn’t sure if the agent just didn’t know to use paragraphs hehe. They also had the same contact person, and I was wondering why this contact person would be based in the Philippines. I’ve searched the phone numbers even in Gcash but couldn’t trace them (adding here for people’s reference: 639774648723, 63968760340).
I saw some other reports with a screenshot of being able to retrieve a tracking number from the website, but they can no longer be retrieved now! All the more suspicious!
I contacted three women from the same post, and I heard back from one of them (B). Apparently, she’s been contacted by three other women already to confirm whether they’re being scammed. They even confirmed that they were sent photos of the same appliances.
She confirmed that someone was indeed trying to scam her. I showed her a photo of JOWA, but she showed me a photo of another guy. This could be expected though since the other women also had different names for the guy trying to scam them. What’s shocking though is that B said they were able to chat on Skype, though they did start on GMail too.
The modus was indeed asking her to provide Php 16,300 (I saw that it could go up to Php 37,000) for “clearance” of the packages. What added to the “authenticity” was that a foreign number is calling her. It’s more insidious than I thought. She was told the package was already in the Philippines and they even sent her videos showing that the package were fragile. Right from the “Urgency” section of the Social Engineering playbook. Thankfully, B had the presence of mind and didn’t send the money.
Like SIS2, B was asked to look for a warehouse to store the appliances. B was also sent Bed Bath & Beyond receipts. B had a sister in LA who checked with Bed Bath & Beyond. The cashier confirmed with B’s sister that it was a scam when B’s sister showed them the receipt. B didn’t show it to me but she confirmed that the receipts didn’t have a date, just the time, like SIS2’s receipts.
Even before B reached out, I already told SIS2 that she’s likely being scammed when I saw the Tagalog comments by the account. SIS2 took it calmly and said that she herself had her suspicions from the start. She had been confronting him since before that he might be a scammer and he just gets cross with her. With B’s message, I was more confident that I had the right conclusion.
Others may have deemed it as a scam as soon as they see the reports on the Facebook posts. Maybe after just taking a look at the cargo company website. It’s been a bit difficult for me though, because I would not want to ruin someone’s romance should I be wrong. So I did chase this one as far as I could.
I’ve saved the webpage in the WayBackMachine for future reference. I’ve belatedly looked up the domain’s WHOIS but didn’t get much relevant data. I did report the website to its domain name registrar. I’ve also reported the scammer’s Facebook account.
I originally titled this piece as “Sleuthing the Scammer” (lol), but I didn’t because I didn’t really. I’m not nearly skilled enough to identify the scammer or the organization. My goal is to give more visibility to what happened so that other women may be able to detect whether they’re being scammed by the same modus.
It didn’t get better. For me.
I was really excited when I got this book. And that might be why I’m this disappointed.
After my mid-read checkin, I was hopeful because the project finally seemed to be moving along. Stickies on a Whiteboard was the next chapter and I loved it! Seeing them go through each tasks, canceling, and assigning them to a particular release was satisfying. I love it when the book is about Chandler. But since that chapter, I’m sad that the book has gone further away from the project.
It became a review of different schools of thought. Has software engineering stagnated or not? Does software development need a do-over? Could we hope to standardize the development process and improve productivity? It felt… theoretical rather than historical. A someone-said-this, but another-said-that. And I’ve had enough of the cathedral and the bazaar references.
There were some gems that I did appreciate though, like this quote from Joel Spolsky:
The real goal of a methodology is to sell books, not to actually solve anybody’s problem… The key problem with the methodologies is that, implemented by smart people, they work. Implemented by shlubs who will not do anything more than following instructions they are given, they won’t work.
Joel Spolsky
This and the Capability Maturity Model triggered my aversion to red tape. It made me vent to my partner how productivity metrics leads to players gaming the system and ultimately sabotaging productivity. The Joel Test sounded like something I could ask companies come job search time. “Masterpiece Engineering” where they monitored painters’ brushes per day and assigned Da Vinci to procurement gave me a chuckle.
I guess it can’t be helped that the progress of Chandler was slow for the time limitation of writing the book. Still, I feel that it should be possible to do a deeper look into the project instead of doing a review of literature.
My expectation might be clouding my judgment. Those in for a philosophical read on managing software projects may appreciate “Dreaming in Code” more.
I found about Dreaming in Code by Scott Rosenberg in a Reddit comment while looking for software development books and I was stoked! I thought then that it was about the makings of a calendar app, and even if it failed, it excited me as a developer who’s also a serial planner. I mean, look at my sched!
The company I work for has a delightful book allowance, so I bought this book along with Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. I was very giddy waiting for it to arrive!
I admit, it was not as I expected, and it had been a very frustrating read. I’m now more than halfway past the book, and page 173 (out of about 400) drove me to write about it.
Well first, it’s not a calendar app, it’s a personal information management system. Which is… GREAT! I’m not really looking to build a calendar, but more of something like a journal. So PIM! I actually drew some really rough mocks and requirements yesterday, and I acknowledge reading about Chandler gave me some drive to actually get started. I even named it Monica! Yes, I know, Chandler isn’t named from FRIENDS Chandler, but he’s who Chandler reminds me of, and Monica is the stickler type of person that would probably appreciate my app.
As my partner noticed, I’m not one for set ups. I found the set up (initial chapters of the book) halting and jumping around too much. I wanted to get started on the app itself, not much on history! But looking back at those chapters, they were actually nice-to-have context. It’s like being ushered in to the software development world and meeting its culture. So this one’s on me.
I’m not going to pretend to know any better than these veteran software developers. I DON’T. I’m green, especially to software development. I don’t even have an IT-related degree! But I’m one with the author here. It’s at this exact page that I was despairing and thinking “WHEN ARE THEY EVER GOING TO GET STARTED?!”
It felt like a lot of meetings and going-arounds without deciding or committing to those decisions. But then I am reminded that even I face the same in the small features that I have ever worked on. A lot of planning and researching, trying out one approach, getting a dead end, trying another, gets another dead end, going back and forth between approaches, then realizing my first one was better all along. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA. And that was just a small feature, not even as important as architectural decisions. These people were changing how we treat information. It’s ground-breaking. And maybe the foundation they were trying to build would prove its worth of the time they’re giving it?
I’ve just finished page 235, Chapter 8: Stickies on a Whiteboard. I’m happy to report that they’ve made much headway since page 173. They’ve finally had a demo day, thank goodness. They’ve shed a lot of features for a while to focus on delivering a working software. I think that’s a good decision.
By page 173, kudos to the author for picking that moment, it seems like they have overcome the project’s activation energy, so it’s been less frustrating for me personally (*laughs*). I’m finally getting insights on their decisions for the app. Chandler already looks like SOMETHING, and I’m getting inspiration! It’s also nice knowing the people who worked on it and their frustrations. My personal favorites are Andy Hertzfeld and Andi Vajda.
On another note, I’m happy this book drove me to write about it because this blog has been sitting on just one post up til now. Hehe.